Not a knock on Facebook, Not a critique of Anonymous….
Just some common sense. 
Is Facebook really censoring as the tweet claims, or is this just crying foul while crying wolf?
Imagine you are a restaurant owner. You own and run a nice family oriented bistro, and a couple of drunks come in, cause a scene, start trouble, and demand to be served.
As a private business owner you would be full within your rights to refuse service, ask the miscreants to leave, or call the police to have them removed for trespassing. All this without worry that you have trampled someones right to eat.
Now extend this scenario to Facebook and its ability to remove what they consider patrons they no longer wish to serve. Whether it be drunk diners or a threatening hacktivist group the standard should be the same.
Since Facebook is considered a private company and not a public platform, FB is fully within current acceptable legal standards when choosing whom and what content to serve. Leaving anons tweets like the one in this post to be irrelevant, but alarmist to their cause.
Do you think of Facebook as a private company with its own product to protect, or public platform that should be protected by 1st amendment rights?



